The debate on the importance of DNA testing continues to rage in the general public as well as legal circles. Opponents of the bill argue that it unconstitutionally violates the constitutional right to privacy and allows people to become a crime scene with little or no notice. supporters claim that the bill only authorizes officials to test samples and not to invade a person’s privacy. Opponents claim that the bill would allow for all sorts of irresponsible and even unethical behavior by third parties and thus could potentially render the test completely useless.
Opponents argue that the legislation would allow criminals and other offenders to avoid arrest and prosecution if they can prove beyond reasonable doubt that they are not guilty. The bill seeks to regulate usage and access to DNA technology for the purpose of only establishing identity of some categories of people, such as convicted felons, sex offenders, drug addicts, military personnel, missing children and unidentified deceased persons. However, the bill has stirred concern among privacy advocates because it does not specifically state who should have access to the DNA samples and results. It also does not make clear which samples may be analyzed or how the data from the samples will be used. There is also confusion over whether or not the bill establishes.
Any rights of privacy for those who are tested.
DNA testing has been used in the past to identify and locate missing people, conduct DNA profiling and establish relationships among known criminals. However, the importance of dna technology goes far beyond these uses. DNA evidence can be used to determine a person’s familial relationship to other individuals and even establish that a person is not genetically related to others. DNA testing has proven to be an important tool in determining the DNA of unknown persons. In addition, DNA testing has been instrumental in establishing the identity and age of many deceased individuals, proving their relatives and people living with them throughout the years. DNA testing has even been used to solve crimes, such as the murder of Jon Benet Ramsay.
Who was found to be the biological mother of Ramsay’s son.
The primary goal of the proposed DNA bill is to expand the current DNA database and make it accessible to everyone. Proponents argue that the expansion would help law enforcement agencies easily identify criminals, stop the rampant growth of crime and improve community safety. Opponents argue that the cost of creating the database will be more than the costs of hiring new police officers, providing security and preventing crime. They also point out that the database already exists and is being used successfully by the FBI and other law enforcement agencies to solve crimes.
As technology advances and crime continue to increase: Concerns about the reliability of DNA testing are also increasing. The problems cited by experts include the fact that it is not always possible to match a sample of a crime scene sample with a sample of a criminal. Also, the errors in testing can lead to faulty convictions. DNA testing cannot be used to prove a person’s innocence or reveal the identity of a person who is known to be a victim of a crime. There are many arguments for and against the importance of DNA testing but these arguments are best determined by research, not by emotion.
If the argument for the importance of DNA technology is based on the argument that it helps solve crimes, then it is also important to know the reasons that crime does not occur more often in a world where DNA profiling is available. Criminals are careful to cover their tracks, so it is difficult to catch them. DNA profiling, if it is done correctly, will help solve these cases. With the increasing number of wrongful convictions, the importance of DNA profiling will only become clear in the near future.
As technology advances and crime decreases, people will come to realize the value of having a DNA database.